Green taxonomy and sustainable finance: identify which part of your activity is genuinely sustainable
The difference between “eligible” and “aligned” — and why it shapes your access to sustainable finance, green credit lines and ESG bonds.
- Who it’s for
- Companies subject to CSRD or seeking sustainable finance
- What you get
- Eligibility and alignment report + KPIs
- Connects with
- Reporting / Sustainability reports, Double materiality
Challenge
A technical exercise, with criteria that keep changing
You need to determine what percentage of your turnover, investment (capex) and operating expenditure (opex) is “taxonomy-eligible and aligned” — a technical exercise, with shifting criteria, that shapes your access to sustainable finance and your reporting obligations.
Our approach
A process that withstands external review, not a rough estimate
We analyse your activity against the technical criteria of each environmental objective, determine eligibility and alignment, and document the process so that it withstands external review.
What we do
- Analysis of activity eligibility against the Taxonomy’s environmental objectives.
- Alignment assessment (technical criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards).
- Calculation of aligned turnover, capex and opex KPIs.
- Documentation of the process for audit.
What you get
An eligibility and alignment report against the Taxonomy, with the KPIs ready to integrate into your CSRD report.
Who it’s for
Companies subject to CSRD, or seeking access to finance and investment labelled as sustainable: green credit lines, ESG bonds or funds with sustainable investment criteria.